Monday, September 29, 2008

Blog #7 - The "truth" in O'Brien's Story

The purpose for writing this blog is to find out the "truth" from O'Brien's essay entitled "How to Tell a True War Story". To be honest, I loved the story and the way the author elaborately talks about war and how it is both beautiful and ugly at the same time. I enjoyed the story about Rat and how his best friend, Lemon, died. I pitied Rat when he poured his heart and soul into writing the letter for "cooze" and never receiving a reply. Even though the details about the water buffalo were disgusting, it made the essay rich and brought the events to life.

However, I do not understand what I'm supposed to label as the "truth" in this story. Based on my understanding of the reading, the "truth" is that war is crazy. O'Brien says, "If a story seems moral, do not believe it" because the actual events usually get mixed up in our heads and when it comes time to say it, it comes out another way. In other words, the truth is contradictory.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Blog #6 - Personal Ranking of All Readings

I have good news and bad news...let's start with the good news. My cousin got married over the weekend and I was a part of the entourage. Yey!!! But because of all the craziness with family members flying in from all over the country, even as far away as the Philippines, I'll give you the bad news...I didn't have a lot of time to reflect on all of the readings that we've done in class and actually rank them according to the criteria of our personal essay. Since Dr. Chandler said that we could miss one blog, I'll use that "no homework pass" for this one. Sorry!!

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Blog #5 - Drummond & Danticat

The main focus of "Alive" by Drummond is pretty much summed up by the last sentence in the essay: "Alertness, tolerance, compassion, suspicion: none of it matters. I am vulnerable simple because I'm alive." Even though she was a police officer and had the experience and training to
not fear the bald-headed man, she was still afraid because she was not that same person she was two years before. The mear fact that she is a human made her vulnerable to any attack that might have happened.

The main focus of "Wesbury Court" by Danticat was the fire that occured in the apartment building where she lived in Brooklyn. From this, Danticat included other events that were related to the fire and how it changed her life completely. Though the neighborhood increasingly became dangerous and filled with much violence over the years, Westbury Court was still her home.

I believe that the main idea that connected these two essays together is the theme of "safety". Both wrote about tragic/scary moments in their lives that made them question if they were safe. If I were to look at the structure, Drummond decided to segment her essay using breaks in between the paragraphs in order to create tension in the reader's mind. Her essay was short and considered an easy read but had a powerful message that made a great impact on me (the reader).

With regards to Danticat's essay, she decided to write the essay without breaks in between the paragraphs. I believe she did this in order to make the story flow. Even though it seemed like her thoughts were constantly shifting from one point to something totally different, it was written in a "stream-of-conscious" (thanks Diana for coming up with this word - so perfect in how it describes the writing of this essay) type of way.

Though the essays were fairly short, the words they used throughout were powerful and made an impact in the reader. I was able to envision everything they were talking about which, in the end, allowed me to see the essays' deeper meaning and purpose as to why it was written in the first place.

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Blog #4 - Schwartz, "My Father Always Said"

The overall focus of the essay "My Father Always Said" by Mimi Schwartz are her father's typical sayings when she was a teenager growing up in Forest Hills, Queens. From this, Schwartz talks extensively about her experience as an American teenager whose parents fled from their hometown of Rindheim when the Nazis forced them to leave during World War II.

In each section, Schwartz goes back and forth from the past of when she was a teenager to the present looking back at her youth. The opening section gives the reader a brief description of her life in Forest Hills, Queens. Her upbringing in America is different from her father's because she has more freedom to go out and do as she pleases, though it is against her fathers wishes. At the end of this section, Schwartz realizes the irony in his father's three favorite sayings ("In Rindheim, you didn't do such things!", "I don't care about everybody!", and "Forest Hills, Queens is not the world.") when they go on a trip to Rindheim at the age of thirteen.

In the second section, Schwartz is in Rindheim with her family in her father's hometown. She wants to go into the house that he grew up in but her father refuses to enter. She sees how different life is in this town compared to her neighborhood in Forest Hills. They reach the synagogue where he would spend his Friday nights. They also find out that the synagogue was converted into a Protestant Evangelical Church in order to accomodate Eastern Germans that settled in Rindheim.

Section 3 starts with Schwartz's father talking about the importance of being in the synagogue on Friday nights. She also begins to see the shift in her father's personality while there in Rindheim. In this section, she describes the man who was a leader, like a Moses who lead his family out of harms way and brought them into America. She notices this change when her mother, for the first time, takes over and serves as the leader. Schwartz also hears about the story of Kristallnacht when all the Jews finally realized that they had to leave in order to save themselves from the Nazis.

In section 4, the family is in the Jewish cemetery. She remembers how the sun lit the names on the gravestones, all somewhat erect yet tilted on either side. She remembers the silence and solemnity of that place looking at each gravestone picturing the people that once lived in that town. Her father also tells her about Tante Rosa who was "deported" because she didn't think the Nazis would bother her. She then remembered all of the other people who had no gravestone of their own because they were killed in the death camps.

The last section starts with Schwartz giving an account of how many people from Rindheim were "deported" or died in concentration camps. She did not know this information when she was a teenager. It was much later when she did her research that she found this out. Schwartz, in the present, described how that trip transformed her father because he no longer said his three favorite sayings. He took up golfing and played with his American friends. He seemed more optimistic and encouraged his daughter to try new things by saying, "Smile, smile! You are a lucky girl to be here!" I guess in a way, Schwartz's father left his old self behind in Rindheim and became a new man because of it.

The gaps in the sections serve as a breaking point wherein the reader could absorb everything that was read. Schwartz would jump back in time and talk about her trip and then go back to the present in another section. Since the subject matter was "heavy", she included the breaks in order for the reader to fully understand and reflect on her experience as a teenager growing up with parents that went through the Holocaust. These breaks helped the reader see how her understanding of her parents and life in general shifted as she got older.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Blog #3 - Orwell & Montaigne vs. everybody else

There are many similarities and differences that distinguish Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" and Montaigne's "That Men Should Not Judge of our Happiness Till After our Death" from the more contemporary works that we've previously read for class.

Orwell's story is similar to "Superman and Me", "Out There", and "Biography of a Dress" because they all read like fiction. These works contain many elements that are found in fiction such as character, setting, plot, etc. The tone in Orwell's piece is strong as with the three examples mentioned because the author's diction evokes emotions in the reader (such as myself) to know exactly what the character is going through and feeling at that moment. There is dramatic tension in Orwell's piece when the main character is torn between having to shoot the elephant in order to not look like a fool in front of others, versus his desire to just leave it alone since it wasn't doing anything to harm him. Dramatic tension can also be found in the three pieces mentioned above because each character had to make a decision that would alter the course of the story and their lives. Orwell's piece is similar to Kincaid's "Biography of a Dress" because the story was centered on one moment - Orwell's centering on his encounter with the elephant, and Kincaid's when she was two years old when her mother made her a dress.

The only similarity that stood out with regards to Montaigne's piece and Lott's "Toward a Definition of Creative Nonfiction" is the use of quotations. Montaigne and Lott's pieces are similar because they are written in the form of an "essai", while the examples mentioned above read like fiction.

Compared to Montaigne's piece, the others were easy reads because of the language that was used throughout. Because Montaigne's piece was written at a much earlier time, the language used in his "essai" made it more difficult to understand. According to Lott's "Definition of Creative Nonfiction", humans want to have and create order in everything that they do, which includes their writing. It seemed to me that Montaigne was trying to create that order in his essay while the other writers created a pattern in their stories that made it flow more naturally. I guess Montaigne's piece was harder for me to understand which is why it was so different from all the other readings we've done in class.

Monday, September 15, 2008

Blog #2 - Lott and Kincaid Readings

In Lott's "Toward a Definition of Creative Nonfiction", Lott does not give an exact definition of what CNF is because he believes that the only way writers will be able to fully understand this style of writing is by creating our own stories or conducting our own tests. What writers need to keep in mind is that we, ourselves, are the creative elements of our own stories - we are the main character!

Creative nonfiction can take on many forms. Many people decide to write CNF in order to preserve special events in their lives, good or bad, as with the case in Kincaid's "Biography of a Dress". I found that Kincaid used Literary Triangulation in her story because she looked at herself "again and again in many different ways from all angles in order to see itself most fully" (Lott, pg. 274). Kincaid wrote retrospectively looking back to when she was two years old, yet in parentheses explained her thinking and current state-of-mind. She fulfills a significant part of CNF in that she shows rather than tells. Kincaid uses a lot of descriptive words to explain to the reader what is happening, bringing us back to when she was two years old when her mother was making the dress for her.

Another definition that Lott coined for creative nonfiction is to question if the writing is "wisdom, or folly". According to dictionary.com, "folly" is "the state or quality of being foolish, or the lack of understanding or sense". I must admit that I didn't really understand what Lott was talking about with regards to wisdom and folly, but if I had to take a wild guess, I'd say that Kincaid demonstrated this in her writing. She did this because she was writing retrospectively about an event in her childhood when her state-of-mind was that where she was foolish and lacked understanding. She included the remarks in parentheses (ex: "I did not ask then because I could not ask then and I ask now but no one can answer me, really answer me" (pg. 212)) because she wanted to redeem herself and say that she no longer is in the same state-of-mind. She asked the questions 'Why did I do that?', 'What was I thinking?', 'Who was I trying to kid?', and 'What did I hope to achieve?' (Lott, pg. 273) and answered them in her writing by means of the comments in parentheses.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Blog #1 - My Definition of Creative Nonfiction

Based on the readings, creative non-fiction is a factual story written in a way that will grab the reader's attention. Creative non-fiction writers are very detailed with regards to who the story is about, where the story is taking place, giving the purpose as to why they are writing the story. As I was reading the articles, I felt as if I was actually the person driving in the middle of nowhere, running away from the lunatic that was trying to kill me! I felt as if I was the Indian boy who loved to read just about anything in hopes that I could break the stereotype and "save my life". I felt like the woman writing in her notebook, looking back and reminiscing on the past quotes and entries, trying to figure out why I put them there in the first place!

These writers put me (the reader) in their shoes by showing me, through their words, the actions taking place.

Monday, September 8, 2008

My First Blog

Test, test....1...2...3.

Just checking to see if this works. I am looking forward to how my blogspot will transform and grow throughout the semester.

-Camille